The Great Empire's Legacy in Eurasia and America's History and Culture: New Chronology
In "History: Fiction or Science?", the authors challenge the conventional understanding of global history, positing a radically different timeline and interpretation of historical events. By re-examining ancient texts, maps, and various religious scriptures, they assert that the accepted chronology is deeply flawed and propose a new narrative that reshapes our perception of the past. This essay explores the core arguments and implications of their hypothesis, focusing on key historical figures, events, and symbols that are reinterpreted within this new framework.
Re-evaluating Historical Timelines
The authors argue that many historical events traditionally dated to antiquity actually occurred much later. They suggest that the destruction of the "antique" world and its culture happened in the late 15th century, not millennia earlier. This claim is based on reinterpretations of biblical texts and other ancient scriptures, including the Bible of Mormons and the Mayan Popol Vuh. By aligning these texts with historical events, they propose a condensed timeline where the events of the Old and New Testaments, the rise and fall of empires, and significant cultural shifts occurred in a much more recent past.
Christopher Columbus: A New Identity
A central figure in this revised chronology is Christopher Columbus, whom the authors equate with biblical patriarch Noah. They draw parallels between the voyages of Noah in the Bible and Nephi in the Book of Mormon, both of whom are described as leading their people across great waters with divine guidance. According to this new chronology, Columbus's voyages to America were not exploratory missions but rather a continuation of a biblically inspired exodus. This reinterpretation also ties into the broader narrative of a global empire led by the Russia-Horde and Ottomania (Atamania), suggesting that the conquest of America was part of a unified imperial strategy.
A famous and high-quality book about Tartaria that cannot be missed: Tartaria - Secrets of Kabbalah
Solutions for Free Electricity and Water during a sinister agenda:
👉 Free Electricity and Water Solutions
The Symbolism of the Two-Headed Eagle
The two-headed eagle, a prominent symbol in medieval heraldry, is reinterpreted within this new chronology as representing the dual authority of the global empire. Traditionally associated with the Byzantine Empire and later adopted by the Holy Roman Empire and Russia, this symbol is seen by the authors as evidence of a single, cohesive empire that spanned Eurasia and the Americas. They argue that the presence of this symbol on various medieval maps indicates a common political and cultural heritage, challenging the notion of separate and distinct civilizations.
The Tordesillas Treaty and the Conquest of America
The Treaty of Tordesillas, signed in 1494 between Portugal and Spain, divided the newly discovered lands outside Europe between the two powers. The authors of "History: Fiction or Science?" suggest that this treaty was part of a grander plan orchestrated by the global empire to control and administer its territories. They argue that the Spanish conquest of America in the 16th century was not an isolated event but rather a coordinated effort by the empire to expand its influence and integrate the New World into its domain.
The Role of Religious Texts
Religious scriptures play a pivotal role in the authors' reconstruction of history. By drawing connections between the Bible, the Book of Mormon, and the Popol Vuh, they argue that these texts document historical events and migrations that are central to understanding the true chronology. For instance, the authors interpret the Book of Mormon's account of Nephi and his people as a historical record of the conquest of the Promised Land, which they equate with the Americas. Similarly, they suggest that the Popol Vuh describes events from the 14th to 16th centuries, including the involvement of Genghis Khan in biblical creation myths.
Related: The Egyptian Zodiacs! History: Fiction or Science?
Implications and Controversies
The authors' hypothesis has far-reaching implications for our understanding of history. If their chronology is accurate, it would necessitate a complete rewriting of historical narratives and a re-evaluation of archaeological and textual evidence. However, their claims are highly controversial and have been met with skepticism by mainstream historians. The re-dating of historical events, the reinterpretation of key figures, and the proposed global empire challenge deeply entrenched academic consensus.
A famous and high-quality book about Tartaria that cannot be missed: